How to save the world, from George Monbiot

George does it again, and inspires me. This great man should receive a Nobel Prize.

A major means of humanity’s attack on nature is overfishing. The worst attack on land-based nature is agriculture — we do need to feed those eight billion humans, somehow.

Suppose we could provide abundant food without torturing and killing animals, releasing terrible chemicals into the environment, using fossil carbon (agriculture is powered by dieseline), covering 70% of the planet with unnatural landscapes. Imagine all the beauty and wonder that could return if we could rewild much of Earth.

The technology is available, now, and it has been well tried in many fields. It is the basis of producing age-old traditional foods, and modern medicines, and various substances needed in industry.

George Monbiot

George is speaking for the movement Reboot Food, which in a delightfully circular way refers to the article from George that inspires my rave.

Have I intrigued you enough to read it for yourself?


If you would like to be a contributor to ‘Wibble’,
please visit Creating content collaboratively.

Posted in ... wait, what?, balance, Biodiversity, Core thought, Environment, GCD: Global climate disruption, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , , , | 29 Comments

A date with sanity

I would like to refer you back to the second video clip on ‘We are what we do‘, the one entitled ‘Arctic Death Spiral and the Methane Time Bomb’. It’s a bit long by today’s go-faster standards: well over an hour. Time well spent, I suggest. In fact, if you haven’t already seen it, your time would be better spent watching that than continuing to read my feeble drivel.

Now, on to the point of this post…

There are several places within ‘Arctic Death Spiral and the Methane Time Bomb’ that feature dates, at the lower right. For instance, at time 58:39 there is a legend ‘3/6/13′.

Clearly, the ’13’ refers to 2013 — just a baker’s dozen years after we learnt what a mistake it was not to store years as four digits. So short, our attention span: we’ve forgotten the millennium bug lesson already.

But, it’s worse than that.

These dates are associated with clips from other video footage, and there is no way to be sure whether the date format used in those clips is month/day/year (which USAns and others will assume) or day/month/year (which Brits like me, and others, will assume). The date ‘3/6/13’ could thus be either 06Mar2013 or 03Jun2013 [1]. So much for data accuracy in scientific material.

My main point, though, is this: if we cannot even agree upon a universal date format, what chance have we of co-operating on anything more important?

Homo fatuus brutus strikes again.


Image of an unusual 'rocking' calendar (for the year 2014)
[1] A long time ago — well, for me, anyway: and, as it happens, in a galaxy that resembled this one but was very, very different — during my early interactions with these new-fangled computer thingies, I taught myself BASIC (beginner’s all-purpose symbolic instruction code). My first computer was a ZX Spectrum; my second was an Amstrad PCW (personal computer word-processor).

Why am I waffling on about this? I’m getting to it…

There was a magazine dedicated to the PCW, ‘8000 Plus’, that ran a regular feature showcasing BASIC programs that were written in just ten lines of code. I toyed with the idea for some time before coming up with such a program of my own, in 1986: I called it ‘valiDATE’. I recall struggling to coerce the mass of code into the requisite ten lines, and the sense of achievement when I finally succeeded. Sadly, I no longer have a copy of the program (such is the fleeting nature of digital memory).

What valiDATE did was accept any date in any format and convert it into what I call ‘UUDF’: universally unambiguous date format. UUDF is ‘nnMmmyyyy’; ie two digits for the day, three letters representing the month (the first upper case, the next two lower case) and then — anticipating Y2K — a four-digit year. UUDF has the benefit of a fixed length (any date from 01Jan0001 through to 31Dec9999 is just nine characters) and it features inbuilt separation of the three fields, by virtue of the switch from numeral to letter and back again.

It’s true that from 1988 we’ve had the option to use ISO 8601 — which has many advantages, but to my mind the biggest downsides with that standard are a) it’s hard to read and b) it offers too many choices which overcomplicate it; YYYY-MM-DD or YYYYMMDD; YYYY-MM but, importantly, not YYYYMM (so as to try to avoid confusion with the ‘truncated form’ YYMMDD — though the attempt fails because that format is still used, and there are similar conflicts with the very common DDMMYY and MMDDYY, albeit that separators are often used in those).

Unsurprisingly, nobody at the ISO asked me for my opinion when they were deciding on the ISO 8601 standard. There is, of course, absolutely no reason why they should as I’m just another grunt; though if they had I might have tried to argue that UUDF is more legible than an all-numeric code, and that, while it might seem that only using the digits 0-9 might make data entry easier, what it really does is makes it more error-prone because it’s all too easy to enter a wrong digit and not realise it.

Oddly enough, I came across this very problem just this past week: I had entered ‘12022010’ instead of ‘12122010’. The error there is easily overlooked: and yet the difference between ’12Feb2010′ and ’12Dec2010′ is immediately obvious.

I do grant you that I had made the mistake of using a dash of parochial thinking in my design of UUDF; I had neglected to consider that those whose first language is other than English will have different names for each of the months. But even so, catering for all such differences is infeasible, and English, by dint of Old Empire (and the linguistic laziness of your average Brit) is more common across our world than almost all other languages.

Given the unlikelihood of our calendar system being changed anytime in the near future, what’s needed is twelve short, unique alphabetic labels, and, though these could be chosen from any language, the set Jan/Feb/Mar/Apr/May/Jun/Jul/Aug/Sep/Oct/Nov/Dec is as good as any and better than many.

For instance: consider the UUDF 01Apr2014. The same date is commonly expressed in a multitude of different ways. In ISO 8601 it could be either (!) 2014-04-01 or 20140401. In fact I often use the latter when naming computer files because of the automagical-date-sort-on-name feature. Alternatively, you can take your pick from many other formats, including 1.4.14, 4/1/14, 1st April ’14, April 1 2014, 1 April 2014… and, of course, All Fools’ Day.

Yes, I chose that date for this example for good reason. We are all fools. I say again: if we cannot even agree upon a universal date format, what chance have we of co-operating on anything more important?

Posted in ... wait, what?, Communication, Computers and Internet, Core thought, Education, Ludditis, Phlyarology, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , , | 28 Comments

What if money expired?

Abba – Money, Money, Money (Official Music Video) – @OfficialABBA

Once again, I find myself with a need to apologise to all of the friends I’ve made in the blogosphere for my ongoing lack of participation here. My life is now very different from how it has been, and my priorities have shifted. For years, I’d made it my mission to try to wake people up to the realities of the multiple crises humanity faces. But when words like ‘woke’ and ‘sustainability’ are perverted by those perverted folks who like things just the way they are, as I see the world crumbling around me, I’ve come to the conclusion that hope is a carrot, dangling forever just out of reach, leading us on, up the garden path (to a dead end).

In Pandora’s Box
Hope’s frosty note lay unread:
“Down pub getting drunk.”

Me, two years ago (almost to the day).

Maybe it’s just because I’m beginning to feel my age…

Pink Floyd – Comfortably Numb (PULSE Restored & Re-Edited) – @pinkfloyd

When I was a child
I caught a fleeting glimpse
Out of the corner of my eye
I turned to look but it was gone
I cannot put my finger on it now
The child is grown
The dream is gone

Pink Floyd, Comfortably Numb

While politicians keep banging on about the economy (using the nonsensical GDP as a yardstick) and perpetual growth (an impossibility on a finite planet), the UNFCC COP sessions have moved into what Those In Charge now no doubt would claim is ‘high gear’, a new number being tacked on to it every year; and yet nothing changes. That’s farcical enough as it is, but COP28, which begins on Thursday and is set to run for over a week (gosh!) is even more so, as it’s being hosted by the UAE, a petrostate that makes a fortune from oil production extraction – and its president is CEO of Abu Dhabi’s National Oil Company.

It’s like something straight out of Blackadder.

A Bout of Insanity | Blackadder | BBC Studios – @BBCStudios

One of the (many) reasons I have so little time to compose blog posts and mix with you guys lately is that, having accepted that the possibility of little me actually doing anything significant to curb the problems facing us all is that I’ve taken to doing instead what little I can in my own neck of the woods. I spend hours every week on my regular litter patrols in my neighbourhood. It’s a never-ending task; somewhat rewarding in that my contribution gives me satisfaction, but it is at the same time disheartening when I think of all the twats out there who clearly don’t give a shit as they chuck their rubbish ‘away’.

And I get free exercise at the same time. It’s a heckuvva lot cheaper than a gym subscription.

I recently stumbled upon an article that kind of >smooshed together< several concepts that I think are highly relevant:

… so, even in this era of powerful soundbites and waning attentions, I found myself drawn into this article, long as it is, and unable to ‘just click away’ as many all too often do these days. It was penned this very month by a chap I’ve never heard of, Jacob Baynham, and is entitled ‘What If Money Expired?’ I’d recommend that you read it… or, if you prefer, you can just listen to the clips I’ve chosen for this post. Or click away elsewhere. Your choice.

Shrug.

Money is abstract, absurd. It’s a belief system, a language, a social contract. Money is trust. But the rules aren’t fixed in stone.

Jacob Baynham, in What If Money Expired?
Pink Floyd – Money (Official Music Video) – @pinkfloyd
Posted in ... wait, what?, balance, Communication, Core thought, Economics, perception, Phlyarology, Strategy | Tagged , | 5 Comments

What the Fossil Fuel Industry Doesn’t Want You To Know

What the Fossil Fuel Industry Doesn’t Want You To Know – @TED

Apologies for my absence lately; I’ve been busy.

The world is going to hell in a handbasket; Al Gore’s TED talk above reveals one of the many ways in which we’re all being manipulated and lied to. And with AI (not Al) on the up, this situation is only going to get worse; it won’t be long before we won’t be able to rely on informative presentations such as this one, as it’s becoming all too easy to put words in others’ mouths.

Posted in ... wait, what?, Climate, Energy, Environment, GCD: Global climate disruption, People, Phlyarology | Tagged , , , , , , | 11 Comments

The Greenpeace 25 Mile Challenge – will you sponsor me, please?

I always enjoy killing two birds with one stone (not literally, naturally; after all, I am a Life Fellow of the RSPB).

My GP admonished me some years ago to exercise more. So I began walking, exploring my neighbourhood – and what I saw on my travels (rubbish everywhere!) irritated me so much that I began carrying a couple of carrier bags, and a grabber, so I could pick up the litter at the same time.

‘Killing three birds’ is even better…

I’ll be taking my first step on the Greenpeace 25 Mile Challenge on 23Oct2023. The aim is to walk 25,000 miles – the circumference of the Earth! 🌎 – before 30Nov2023.

Impossible? Well, yes, of course such an epic task is impossible for just one person (gets out calculator: walking ~650 miles a day for 39 days works out at ~27 miles per hour – with no time to sleep, eat, and, er, do those other necessary things).

But I won’t be alone; 999 others are joining me to share the load, so each of us has to only walk a thousandth of the total, that is to say 25 miles; and as my current litter patrol target is ~16 miles a week (which I’m certain is peanuts to some), I can easily manage a mere 25 in five weeks.

So, long story short: would you sponsor me for this Greenpeace challenge, please?

Future Utopia ft. Avelino and Tomorrow’s Warriors – Don’t Stop (Official Video) – @GreenpeaceUK

PS As I wrote this, Greenpeace sent me an update that says it already has 750 of the 1,000 participants for this event. You can join in if you want – I strongly suspect that the thousand ‘limit’ is just a marketing ploy to get buzz going; I very much doubt they’ll turn anyone away. You can get a free t-shirt! :)

Posted in collaboration, crowdsourcing, Environment, Health | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

For the birds

[HD] Pixar – For The Birds | Original Movie from Pixar – Clips Hay
Posted in ... wait, what?, Just for laughs, Phlyarology | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

How to turn climate anxiety into action

A TED talk by Renée Lertzman, climate psychologist

It’s deeply painful to face what’s happening on our planet right now. From forests burning, ocean plastic, species just gone each day, displacement. It’s easy to feel totally overwhelmed. Maybe a bit helpless. Powerless. Angry. On fire. Numb. Disconnected. Perhaps all of the above.

These messy and complicated feelings, they make total sense. I wish that someone had said this to me 30 years ago. I was a college freshman taking environmental studies, which is basically a semester of really bad news about all the ways that humans have profoundly damaged our beautiful earth. And I felt like I had been dropped into a dark tunnel, given no tools to get out and yet expected to carry on with my everyday life as if things were normal. But once you’re exposed to that kind of information, things are not normal anymore. And I was anxious, I was terrified, no one was talking about this, and I almost dropped out of school, for real.

But instead, I signed up for a field study in California, and we were backpacking together as a small group for two months, which I know sounds very intense. And it was, but what I found is that we talked a lot. We talked about how we were feeling about the world, openly and honestly, and no one told me at any point to be more positive or more hopeful. Not once. And surprisingly, I found myself feeling better. I actually felt like I could face these issues that had seemed so insurmountable more head on. And I had this epiphany: What if by understanding ourselves and one another, we could find our way through this crisis in a new and different way? You know, what if psychology actually held a missing key to unlocking action on the greatest challenges facing our planet right now?

So when I got back from the field study, I focused on clinical psychology, and I researched the relationships between trauma and grief and creativity. And the paradox at the heart of, I think, all of this is how do we stay present with what’s really painful, how do we stay connected in the face of what’s threatening and overwhelming and scary? And it turns out that psychology knows a lot about these things. Truly, a lot. But I wasn’t hearing any of this being referenced in my environmental studies class, or the climate action meetings I started going to, or the international conferences, where everyone is asking: Why aren’t we acting faster, and what’s it going to take?

And so this has become my mission of sorts, which is that I take insights from psychology and I translate them into resources and tools to support those working on the frontlines to turn things around. And that means for anyone, by the way. We’re all on the frontlines right now. And it’s my belief, after years of straddling these worlds between environment and climate and psychology, that this actually is a missing ingredient in our work that can exponentially accelerate our capacities to be creative and resilient and capable and skillful and courageous and all those things that the world is needing from us right now.

So I’m going to share three concepts with you that I found particularly game-changing and how I make sense of this moment for us as humans. And the first is something called our window of tolerance. So Dr. Dan Siegel has described us all as having a window. How much stress can we tolerate while staying connected and what clinicians would call “integrated.” Integrated, where we can actually be in touch with our thoughts and feelings and not just get kind of co-opted. And we all have a threshold. And what happens when we experience stress beyond what we can tolerate? We tend to go into the edges of our window. And on one hand, we might go into a sort of collapse, what’s called a chaotic response, which looks like depression, despair, kind of a shutting down. And on the other side of this window is a more rigid response: denial, anger, rigid.

And so when that happens, we actually lose our capacity to be integrated, resilient, adaptive, all those things that we want to be. And this is totally normal, but it’s happening all around the world right now, right? We’re all vacillating between these different feelings and emotions.

And so with something like climate change, with every new scientific report, documentary, connecting the dots between, you know, what we’re doing and the impact it’s having, it can collectively be pushing us outside of our window of tolerance. And we lose that capacity, right? So, over the years, I’ve interviewed hundreds of people from all backgrounds and political affiliations, from the Midwest US to China, and I talked to people about how are we feeling about what’s happening. Not what opinions or beliefs. What are we feeling about what’s going on with your local environment, with your water, your soil, the big picture. And what I hear from people almost across the board, I’m telling you, is a bind. People tell me at some point in the conversation, “I care very deeply about what’s happening, I’m incredibly freaked out. I’m scared, I love this land, I love the birds,” whatever that is, “But I feel like my actions are insignificant. And I don’t know where to start. And I’m also –” I hear between the lines of what people say — “I’m really scared to change. Really scared of any change, it’s so — I can’t even think about it, it’s like, unthinkable.”

And this is the second concept, which is something called a double bind. And a double bind is when we feel sort of like, damned if you do, and damned if you don’t, and you’re just kind of stuck there. It’s a very intolerable human experience. And we will do anything we can to get rid of it and just push it away. And so all that care and concern, it’s there, it just goes down, it goes underground.

But what happens is, it looks like people don’t care, it looks like apathy. And so a lot of folks who are seeing the urgency of the situation are like, “We’ve got to motivate you. We’ve got to get you psyched.” And we become cheerleaders for solutions. Or like, “Here’s the facts, this is happening, wake up.” And these things are actually not inherently bad, because we need solutions and we need to face the facts. But inadvertently, this can backfire and lead to more numbing and inaction, which is very perplexing for a lot of people. It’s like, what the heck is going on, right? And so, this is because of this, you know, it’s not really touching what’s going on underneath.

So imagine that you go see a therapist, and you’ve got a double bind. You’re feeling really stuck, you know you’ve got to change and the therapist starts shouting at you and saying, “Don’t you see what’s happening? If you don’t act now, you’re going to face terrifying consequences. Don’t you care? What’s wrong with you? What’s it going to take?” Or you see a therapist and you’re feeling actually sad and grief. And this therapist says, “You know, don’t think about it too much. Here’s some simple things you can do. Simple positive things.” And sends you on your way.

So if it were me, I would fire this therapist immediately, because a good therapist practices something called attunement. I love this concept so much. Attunement, right, the word “to tune.” And attunement is when we’re feeling in sync, when we feel understood and we feel accepted for exactly where we are. And we feel that, you know, we’re in relationship with the world in a way that makes sense, no one’s trying to change us or shame us or judge us. Right?

And attunement takes skill. When the stakes are high, let me tell you, it’s very hard to want to attune with anything, when we’re facing such urgent threats. But the paradox of the moment we’re in is that when we are more in tune in our window of tolerance, we are so much more capable of solving problems, being creative, being adaptive, being flexible, being our brilliant selves, right?

So what if our climate and environmental work was informed by these concepts, right, of window of tolerance, lot of double binds and attunement? So it can look like a whole lot of things. So I’m asked all the time, “OK, Renee, this sounds awesome for a clinical context, we don’t have time for this.” And that is absolutely not true. Because we can bring attunement into every aspect of our work on this issue. And it starts with ourselves.

You actually can’t do attunement unless you’re in touch with yourself, I’m sorry to break it to you. There’s no way around it. It’s from the inside out. And so it starts with actually tuning in to “how am I feeling?” And being compassionate. I know it’s easy to say but really being compassionate, it’s like, these are hard issues. This is a hard moment to be a human being, we’re waking up. I’m not a bad person. What’s going on, bring curiosity into our own experience, which then allows us to attune socially, that’s the next way we can apply this, is attuning, whether it’s in small groups or one-on-one, campaigning, strategy, classrooms, movie theaters, parks. Where we can give each other permission to just be who we are, and again, this allows us to move into the higher level functioning. The executive function, the prefrontal cortex, when we feel that our nervous system can calm down and we are understood by the other.

And the third way is leading with attunement. As leaders and influencers, showing up as human, as real, saying, “You know what? I am really scared. I don’t know what all the answers are.” Can you imagine leaders saying that? “I don’t know. But here we are, and we’re all needed. And we’re in this together. And we can do this.” That’s a very different message than just, “We can do this,” right. It’s like, “Here we are. I’m scared, but this is happening.”

So here’s the thing, all of this work exists, we have the tools to create these conditions that can allow us to show up as our brilliant selves. And I know, without doubt, 100 percent, that each one of us has the capacity to meet these challenges with the ingenuity and brilliance and bravery that we as humans have. We just need to cultivate the conditions together. We need each other. To support each other and allow ourselves to really meet this. That’s what we need, so … Let’s take a deep breath. Have compassion for ourselves and one another in this moment, time in history, so we collectively process these painful truths, these difficult realities. Let’s do this together. The world is ready for us to do this. And we can do this.

Thank you.

Renée Lertzman
Posted in balance, Climate, Communication, GCD: Global climate disruption, Health, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Leaf it out, Comma

The other day, I happened to spot something unusual, so took this pic of the Aesculus hippocastanum (horse chestnut tree) I planted as a conker back in 1986†.

Leaf it out

There was a reason for this particular shot. Can you see what it was? (If you’re struggling to find it, click on the image above for a close-up that may enlighten).

Isn’t nature wonderful?

† If my little tree interests thee,
please visit my Bonsai Diary.

Posted in ... wait, what?, art, Bonsai Diary, illusion, perception | Tagged , , , , | 13 Comments

George Monbiot on the Pollution Paradox

George Monbiot DESTROYS Rishi Sunak AND Keir Starmer – @DoubleDownNews

George Monbiot: Ah, yes, the “man of the people,” Rishi Sunak: doesn’t even know how to fill up his own car; doesn’t even seem to know how to use a credit card; who treats the entire nation as a fly-over state as he flips from one place to another in his helicopter; who travels between his multiple homes, including one that he keeps in London solely for guests to stay in.

This is an immensely privileged man, the richest man in Parliament, who claims that he’s pursuing his policies for the sake of the working man and woman. The man and woman in the street. “That’s why I’m against ULEZ, the ultra low emission zones; that’s why I’m against all these other Green measures, even 20 mile an hour zones, solely for the sake of you, the ordinary person who I emote with and connect with so strongly (from 1000 foot up in my helicopter)” – but who is really representing the dirtiest of all industrial interests.

You cannot understand politics in this country, or, indeed, in any other, without grasping an essential insight into how it works, that is called the Pollution Paradox. And the Pollution Paradox works as follows: the industries and the billionaires and oligarchs with the greatest incentive to invest in politics are those involved in the dirtiest and most antisocial businesses; those who are causing the pollution; those who are treating their workers like shit; those who are exploiting their consumers; those who are dumping their costs onto society.

These are the people with the greatest incentive to invest in politics, because if they don’t, they’ll be regulated out of existence – because people don’t like them. People will vote against their interests if they get the chance. And as a result of that – and this is the crucial point – politics comes to be dominated by the dirtiest and most antisocial companies, and the political parties which win elections are those which are backed by the dirtiest and most antisocial companies. And that is where the Conservatives are today.

Kier Starmer: And look, if that sounds Conservative, then let me tell you, I don’t care. Somebody has got to stand up for the things that make this country great, and it isn’t going to be the Tories.†

George Monbiot: Keir Starmer’s entire shtick seems to be, “Don’t worry, Rupert Murdoch, I’m not coming for you.” What appalling cowardice, what a collapse in the face of oligarchic power. This guy is no democrat; he does what the plutocrats tell him to do, and that makes him a plutocrat. He goes on TV and in the media publicly to beat up environmental activists. He attacks Just Stop Oil on the completely mistaken idea that they’re trying to stop the use of all fossil fuels immediately, from day one. In fact, what they’re trying to do is to stop the exploitation of new sources of oil and gas.

Now, some optimistic people say, “Well, you know, Keir Starmer might be lousy in opposition, but once he’s in government, then he’s going to toughen up.” No, sorry; if it’s not in your manifesto, you don’t then have a mandate to do it. And already he’s tying his own hands. He says he’s going to stick to Tory spending rules, just like the ill-fated Ed Miliband campaign was going to do. Why, when Tory spending rules are trashing this country, when they’ve destroyed our public services, he won’t be able to spend the money required to create the Green Transition that we need. And sticking to Tory fiscal rules, of course, also means that you leave economic structures intact. You don’t do anything about the massively rising inequality; and that means that you’re not taking a neutral position, you’re siding with the rich against the poor, you’re siding with the few against the many.

Kier Starmer: My Labour Party is unashamedly pro-business.

George Monbiot: Just Stop Oil is right, and the government is wrong. But because Just Stop Oil is trying to defend our lives against the fossil fuel companies, it finds itself at odds with the politicians who are sponsored by those fossil fuel companies. Recently, the Tory Party has taken 3.5 million pounds from pollutocrats. It is unequivocally on the side of the fossil fuel companies, so it uses Just Stop Oil as a whipping boy, as a scapegoat, as a way of defining itself against something. It says, “We’re not like those people who are interfering with you, the God-fearing decent working men and women of this country who we stand shoulder to shoulder with while we’re 1000 feet up in our helicopter: we are against those scuzzy people who are trying to stop you from getting to work.”

But actually, what those ‘scuzzy people’ are trying to do is to permit human life to continue. It’s to permit the habitable planet to be sustained because they’re following the science, and the science says we have to leave the oil and gas in the ground; we can’t open up any reserves which haven’t already been opened. But Rishi Sunak has completely ignored that advice: the advice not just of the International Energy Agency; not just of the world’s climate scientists; the advice of his own advisers, such as the Climate Change Committee of the UK Government.

And the really shocking aspect of all this is that Sunak has done it just for a few good headlines. For the most trivial and ephemeral gains for a few more months of his own personal political survival, he is undermining the welfare of the entire human species. It doesn’t get much lower than this.

Politicians nowadays are always pursuing the ‘wedge issue’. This is the Lynton Crosby strategy, the Tory strategist who said, “We’ve got to find the issue which divides people away from the Labour Party and onto your side, and it doesn’t matter what the issue is, y’know, it can be a culture war issue, immigration, asylum, those always work well.” Now they’ve latched onto the Green agenda as a wedge issue, and it’s not through any conviction that Sunak is doing this, it’s simply to create another wedge issue. It’s another part of the spectrum of political warfare that the Tories are engaging in. They always tell you, “Oh, it’s impossible, we can’t make that change and other people aren’t, so why should we be the ones to do it?”

And in fact, the UK has fallen way behind other countries, including countries much poorer than ourselves. I mean, the world leader in environmental policy is Costa Rica, with a fraction of our GDP, but it’s done extraordinary things. Its forest cover has gone from 24% to 57% in just a few decades through brilliant foresight and the environmental policies which follow from that. Even France, just across the channel, is doing extraordinary things to try to transform itself into an ecological civilization. It’s not perfect by any means, of course it isn’t, but it’s way, way ahead of where we are.

We are now being left behind in the fossil age. It’s not because it’s good for us, far from it, it’s very bad for us indeed. It’s because of corruption. It’s because the government is effectively owned by fossil fuel interests.

This isn’t just a question of what happens to our children and grandchildren. We will start to see the effects in our own lifetimes. We’re already seeing massive fires across large parts of the planet. We’re seeing huge heat domes with devastating heatwaves which have already killed thousands of people through heat exhaustion. And now we’re seeing even more alarming signs. A massive sea surface temperature anomaly like nothing we’ve ever seen before, which could lead to the collapse of marine food chains. We’ve already begun to see massive storms and floods, which have been greatly exacerbated by climate breakdown. We’re seeing, in the Antarctic, ice melt which is just completely off the charts.

A few weeks ago, one of the most important scientific papers ever published was released. It said that we have greatly underestimated the chances of what’s called ‘simultaneous breadbasket failure’, which basically means that very large numbers of people will not be able to eat adequately. Now, this paper got five mentions in the media anywhere on Earth. A scandal about a British TV personality called Phillip Schofield got 10,000 news stories dedicated to it.

In the media, celebrity gossip is literally considered thousands of times more important than what our objectively and obviously the most important stories on Earth, and that applies right across the media and right across our politics.

So we’re faced at this moment by these two existential crises: the existential crisis facing humanity as a result of environmental breakdown; the existential crisis facing the industries causing that breakdown, the fossil fuel industry, meat industry, internal combustion industries and the others which have to be regulated out of existence.

Only one of us can win. And if they win, in the long run, everybody loses.


The media thinks that celebrity gossip is thousands of times more important than environmental breakdown. Well, at Double Down News, we have a different view: we think that what is important should be salient and what is salient should be important. So, please support us by becoming a patron through Patreon. Thank you.


The transcript above was made with the help of Sonix, which did most of the donkey work for a tiny fee (I did have to spend some time tidying it up). Note that I do not have the copyright owner’s permission to publish this transcript here. I’ve investigated the copyright rules regarding transcriptions (more about that here), and one thing I’ve learned is that it’s no defense to make a disclaimer like “these aren’t my words, no copyright infringement intended.” However, I offer the transcription here as a service to society (especially the deaf community). I do hope the copyright owner won’t object. And I hope that you find this video as entertaining and/or interesting as I did.


My tuppence

† George missed a trick here, because he could have pointed out what Kier didn’t say when pointing that finger at the other guy: neither of the two big UK political parties are going to stand up for what makes the UK great.

Yes, it may be a hackneyed point, but it’s one that few (apart from those who don’t bother to vote) understand: our so-called ‘democracy’ is fatally flawed by the first-past-the-post (FPTP) voting system; a system that neither of the big two political parties will ever change, because it works in their favour – and, more importantly, in the favour of those who fund them and pull their strings.

My view is that, yes, clearly we must get the Tories out of power in the 2024 general election. And the only way to do that, in this broken system, is going to be to vote tactically to deny them a majority. But there’s voting by putting an ‘X’ on a voting ballot; and then there’s ‘voting’ in the only way that makes any sense at all in a system in which money means political control: by providing financial support to the only party that stands up for climate justice and social justice. It’s not funded by big business and vested interests – which, of course, means that it’s David against Goliath – it’s funded by people like you. I’m referring, of course, to the Green Party.

(Wouldn’t it be great if all those disillusioned, and effectively disenfranchised, electors, those who stoically bear the label ‘apathetic’, were all to vote Green? … I’m dreaming, of course.)

Posted in ... wait, what?, Core thought, GCD: Global climate disruption, News and politics, People, perception, Phlyarology, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Don’t. Stop. (Thinking about tomorrow….)

Future Utopia ft. Avelino and Tomorrow’s Warriors – Don’t Stop (Official Video) – @GreenpeaceUK


Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow
Don’t stop, it’ll soon be here
It’ll be better than before
Yesterday’s gone, yesterday’s gone

It’s either you stand for something or fall for anything
Gotta give my all, I’m putting in everything
Common sense ain’t common anymore
You’d think we’re more intelligent
Making an impacts imperative
The latest trends, all irrelevant
Nothings as wild as human nature
And I’m in a room full of elephants
God save the planet
But we’re the ones that really need saving
We’re too worried about what we’re generating
And not about the next generation
Gotta do it for the family tree
And it’s not too late but Father Time will slow down the clock
and Mother Nature said you’re testing her patience

Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow
Don’t stop, it’ll soon be here
It’ll be better than before
Yesterday’s gone, yesterday’s gone

Madness all in the name of power and profit
We don’t need a prophet to warn us the issues now and we’re the problem
Everyone’s wearing a sugar coat
Dressing up the naked truth
But it’s gonna cost us wearing these costumes
Even if the voices feel too loud
Turn up the volume
Let’s be sustainable, we’re so replaceable
Climate change isn’t un-changeable
Don’t need a cape to be capable
Nobody’s superman but this could save us all
This call to arms, who’s gonna make the call?
We’re so divided but we’ve gotta multiply actions

Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow
Don’t stop, it’ll soon be here
It’ll be better than before
Yesterday’s gone, yesterday’s gone

Don’t you look back

Posted in art, balance, Biodiversity, Climate, Communication, Core thought, Energy, Environment, GCD: Global climate disruption, Strategy | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Being a billionaire doesn’t mean you’re not totally nuts

The ‘The Richest Person on the Planet Hat’ is passed around from time to time. When I wrote my ‘open letter to all billionaires, everywhere‘ post in September 2020, Jeff Bezos had the hat. Forbes World’s Billionaires List 2023 now shows Bezos as #3, with Elon Musk at #2, and some geezer I’ve never heard of (I don’t know if that’s a good thing, or a bad thing), Bernard Arnault, holding the hat.

The thing is, at least from where I sit, far too many people seem to believe that ‘being a billionaire’ is synonymous with ‘being incredibly brilliant’. That’s not the way I see it. Smart, well, yes (in some ways). Hard-working, certainly. The factor few take into account is blind luck: some will succeed, others won’t.

Not long ago, Elon Musk was reported as saying the following:

If people don’t have more children, civilization is going to crumble. Mark my words.

Elon Musk (as reported by CNBC, 07Dec2021)

Really.

I reacted to this on Twitter, and was attacked by a dimwit who clearly believed the myth that ‘billionaires must be smart’. Interspersed with suggestions that I was ‘dense’, he wittered on about how the Earth’s ‘carrying capacity’ has been increased, and suggested that I ‘google productivity’. Another moron adjured me to, “Look at statistics – birth decline is real. World need young people.”

I have indeed looked at the statistics. Here’s one example, where you can see in real time that the numbers of the members of the species homo fatuus brutus are going decidedly up, minute by minute. Not down.

Yes, human fertility is declining. But it is in no way crashing. The net increase of births over deaths at present is approximately 1.3% per year. That equates to a doubling time of ~53 years (if you doubt that, you need to watch Professor Albert Bartlett’s lecture ‘Arithmetic, population and energy‘). Or, to put it another way, there are now ~8 billion people on our planet. In less than one human lifetime, if things continue as they are (which, given the climate crisis, is impossible) there would be twice as many people on the planet, ie 16 billion. The United Nations estimates that our numbers will peak at 11 billion (and, barring mass starvation and/or genocide on a horrific scale, I cannot understand how they arrive at that figure).

And, yes, of course the world needs young people. However, there are in fact a great many right now, and far too many are suffering, badly – but far away, and, to far too many, they simply don’t count, as they’re not ‘our own’, and so the eye that turns to them is blind. That we’re not collectively doing far more about their plight than we are sickens me to the core.

Pink Floyd – On The Turning Away [HQ] (Live 1988)

Back to Elon Musk and his bizarre assertion, which all too many are willing to believe simply because “he’s a billionaire, and therefore ‘a really smart guy’.” His statement is not wrong, per se: if nobody were to have any more children, then humanity would disappear, duh. To my mind, he’s just rationalising his own selfish behaviour. He already has nine – at least? – children of his own: if he were really so concerned about the fate of civilization, it would, surely, be better all round were he to adopt starving orphans instead (he can’t claim he can’t afford to do that). But, no, instead he wants to procreate; over and above the prehistoric urge to spread one’s own seed, no doubt he believes that his genes are far superior.

If you are on the fence about Musk’s credentials as some kind of genius, then I urge you to read the article ‘Elon Musk’s Shadow Rule‘. It’s pretty long, but I found it compelling: my take-away from it is that, while we should all be concerned about AI in the long term, there’s a much more serious danger in the near term, and its initials are EM.

One of the ‘genius’ things that Elon Musk has done of late is to rebrand Twitter as ‘X’. The first I knew about that was when my pinned tab featuring a blue bird icon vanished (‘twould have been nice if the Chief Twit had let his userbase know in a more friendly way). Meanwhile, the BBC and others still refer to it as ‘Twitter’; go figure. I have to ask myself what kind of idiot thinks it’s a good idea to rebrand anything with, of all things, an icon that commonly means ‘close’ / ‘shut’ / ‘end’ / ‘finish’ / ‘terminate’. Or, indeed, ‘deactivate’.

Well, I’m about to deactivate my Twitter – sorry, ‘X’ – account. The ‘X Help Center‘ assures me that, ‘After your 30-day deactivation window, your Twitter account is permanently deleted.’ I did try, briefly, to determine whether ‘deleting the account’ is synonymous with ‘deleting all of the personal data held about me by that arm of Big Tech Controlled By Mr Musk The Genius’, but I failed miserably on that front (I’m clearly no genius as I’m not a billionaire), and since I wouldn’t believe any of its assurances anyway if it were to give any, I didn’t bother wasting my time further on it.

Posted in ... wait, what?, balance, Core thought, People, Phlyarology, Rants, Science | Tagged , , , , , | 34 Comments

Politicians: we demand better!

My bro sent me a link to this ‘open letter to (UK) politicians’ this morning.

I agree wholeheartedly with every word, and, though I don’t believe that petitions do very much (or voting, for that matter, given that our political system is so badly flawed), I certainly don’t want to be accused of apathy.

Adding my name bumped the total signatories up to 98,430 – so there’s still a long way to go to achieve the million Greenpeace is aiming for. If you agree, please sign (link at foot of letter), and perhaps comment to say what the total is when you do?


To Political Party Leaders:

Our country is broken. For too long politicians have chosen the interests of big business over ordinary people. We’re sick of getting poorer, whilst companies trash the natural world and line their pockets from our inflated bills.

We face many crises – climate, cost of living, energy security, inequality and the challenges to our economy. The clear solutions to them all lie in more ambitious climate policy, not less.

We’re joining together to demand a safe climate and a future where the next generations can flourish. You have to invest in good quality, affordable homes powered by cheap and clean renewable energy. We want safer, quieter streets and cleaner air through reliable and accessible public transport. And you must restore our nature-depleted land – this is vital for our food security and to ensure young people inherit a country rich in wildlife.

We have the answers, what’s lacking is your political leadership. 

Fossil fuels need to become a thing of the past. That means no new oil and gas and no more unjust profits for fossil fuel bosses. The biggest polluters must be taxed for the destruction they’re causing to our planet. And workers in polluting industries must be supported into good green jobs.

We will judge you at the next election, you have to step up. Securing a liveable planet hinges on actions taken by the end of this decade. The failure of successive governments has got us into this current mess, but your decisive actions can get us out of it.

A brighter future for all is within our grasp if you are bold and brave enough to deliver it. 

We are fighters, we are voters and we demand better.

With power and unity,

[Sign the petition if you agree!]

Posted in Climate, Economics, Energy, Environment, Food, GCD: Global climate disruption, Health, News and politics, Strategy | Tagged , , , , , | 11 Comments