The Absurd Search For Dark Matter

The Absurd Search For Dark Matter (see YouTube description for research links) by Veritasium

Derek Muller: I am at a gold mine a couple of hours outside of Melbourne because one kilometre underground they are putting in a detector to look for Dark Matter. Let’s go. It’s going to take 30 minutes to go down a kilometre underground.

Dark Matter is thought to make up 85% of all the matter in existence. It could form a shadow universe five times more massive than everything we can see. Over the past several decades, over fifty experiments have tried to make a direct detection of Dark Matter; but none of them has found anything.

Except one.

Under a mountain in the Italian Alps, there is a Dark Matter detector called DAMA/LIBRA. It’s been collecting data for around 20 years [since 2003], and every year it sees the same peculiar results. The rate of detections increases to a peak in June and then decreases to a minimum in November. Some scientists think this could be the first direct evidence of Dark Matter. But why would Dark Matter create a periodic annual signal? Well, this is our galaxy, or at least what it looks like with visible light. Astronomers suspect it is surrounded and permeated by a huge sphere of Dark Matter; invisible particles that are zipping around all in random directions. According to most theories, Dark Matter doesn’t interact with anything, including itself, except through gravity. We think there should be five times as much Dark Matter as there is ordinary matter.

Now, our solar system is moving around the galaxy at 220 kilometres per second. That means we’re also moving through Dark Matter at this rate, except Earth orbits the Sun at 30 kilometres a second. So, for half the year, we’re moving with the Sun, going faster through Dark Matter, and the other half the year we’re moving in the opposite direction, so going slower through Dark Matter. And the idea is we encounter more Dark Matter when we’re moving through it fastest, which happens to be in June, and less of it when we’re moving slowest, which happens in November. The actual geometry is a little more complicated; the solar system is tilted at 60° relative to the plane of the galaxy, but the idea still works. So, the signal observed a DAMA/LIBRA may be due to this motion through Dark Matter.

Or… It might not be due to Dark Matter at all. It could just be something mundane, like the temperature, humidity, moisture in the soil, the snow on the mountain, or the number of tourists in Italy. All of these things fluctuate with a period of one year, and that is why they’re going to build an almost identical experiment in the southern hemisphere, down the bottom of this gold mine outside of Melbourne, because there the seasons are reversed, but our motion through Dark Matter is still the same. So, if we see the same signal, it’s pretty strong evidence for the existence of Dark Matter.

Prof Geraint Lewis: One of the big problems that DAMA/LIBRA has is that there are other very similar experiments that don’t see anything and this has led to a lot of uncertainty about… is the DAMA/LIBRA signal really Dark Matter? So, yeah, you know, we don’t know; the favorite thing in science.

Derek Muller: But why do we think Dark Matter exists in the first place? In 1933, Swiss astronomer Fritz Zwicky was studying the Coma Cluster, a collection of more than a thousand galaxies. These galaxies are gravitationally bound together, so they all orbit around their collective center of mass. Zwicky measured the orbital speeds of these galaxies and found that some were moving way faster than he expected. It was as if there was a lot more matter in the cluster than he could see, pulling everything inwards. So, he proposed the existence of invisible matter, which he called ‘Dunkle Materie’, the origin of the term ‘Dark Matter’. No one really took this idea seriously, but 40 years later, Dark Matter turned up again. Vera Rubin and Kent Ford observed the motion of stars in the Andromeda Galaxy, and they expected that the farther out from the center you go, the slower the stars would be orbiting. But this is not what they found. The rotational velocity stays almost constant with increasing distance from the center. Without additional mass in the galaxy to pull those stars in, they should be flung off into space. The result was the same in other galaxies. Using radio telescopes, Albert Bosma and others measured hydrogen gas even further out from a galaxy’s center; but the rotational velocity still stayed constant. One way to explain this is to posit the existence of matter we can’t see: Dark Matter, which holds all these galaxies together.

So, let’s say you have a star and this represents the mass of everything in the center of the galaxy that’s pulling the star in. The star can maintain a stable orbit if its centripetal force is equal to the gravitational attraction to all the mass in the rest of the galaxy. And so you can see that at about a distance of one metre, this is the speed of the orbit. But what happens if we add some Dark Matter? So, this water bottle represents the matter we can’t see. Now there is more mass pulling this star into the middle, which means at the same orbit it can now go much faster, and in fact it must go faster to maintain that orbit; and this explains the observation. This is what we see.

By looking at the rotation speeds of stars, scientists estimate that about 85% of the mass of a galaxy is Dark Matter. But there’s another way to explain these observations without invoking Dark Matter, and that is to modify our theory of gravity.

What’s the supporting evidence for thinking that the particle idea is totally misguided and that we should actually be looking at a revised theory of gravity?

Prof Geraint Lewis: You can either invoke something we can’t see, or you just say, well, the universe is what we can see, and we need a way to explain what’s going on out there; and the only way we can do that is by modifying the laws of physics. So when you look at the outskirts of galaxies, they’ve got a lot of centripetal acceleration. Dark matter says, well, that centripetal acceleration is due to the gravitational effect of Dark Matter, whereas the people like MOND will say, no, that’s centripetal acceleration; that’s just the fact that it’s now reached this floor and can’t get any lower. So they’re saying that there’s not additional force – due to Dark Matter – but there’s a limit to how low the acceleration could go. I think the consensus is hugely in favor of it being a physical substance in that it just seems reasonable that there could be other particles out there that we haven’t seen yet.

And there’s more evidence. This is the Bullet Cluster, a site where two clusters of galaxies collided. Most of the ordinary mass of these clusters is in the interstellar gas; and when the collision occurred, the interstellar gas interacted, heated up and slowed down. So, you’d expect that most of the mass of the Bullet Cluster would be in the middle where all of this gas is. But if you use gravitational lensing, the way that gravity bends light, you can actually measure where most of the mass in this picture is, and it isn’t in the middle; it’s actually on either side. So, the best way to explain this is that when the clusters collided, all that gas got stuck in the middle, but the Dark Matter passed right through, creating the most gravitational lensing where we can see the least ordinary matter.

Even more evidence for Dark Matter comes from the oldest light in the Universe. 380,000 years after the Big Bang, light could finally travel through the universe unimpeded, and this is what we see as the cosmic microwave background or CMB. The red spots show where the early universe was a little hotter, and the blue spots show where it was a little cooler. But these temperature differences were tiny, just 0.01%. But they are there. And you can turn this picture into a graph by counting up how many blobs there are of different sizes. So there’s the most common-sized blob which results in this peak, but there are also other common-sized blobs, and so you get these other peaks of decreasing size. Now, the height of these peaks depends on how much Dark Matter there is. In a universe without Dark Matter, the graph looks like this; but as Dark Matter increases, the amplitudes of even-numbered peaks decreases. To match the measurements of the CMB, we need about five times as much Dark Matter as ordinary matter.

This figure also agrees with the amount of Dark Matter required to explain the motion of stars and galaxies and the motion of galaxies and clusters. So, the Dark Matter hypothesis explains a lot of different observations with a simple theoretical framework: that there’s some type of particle out there that only interacts through gravity. But what is this particle exactly? Since we don’t know, scientists have proposed a whole bunch of different things that it could be, and now we have to try to go out and find them. The approach differs depending on what you’re trying to find. DAMA/LIBRA and the detector at the bottom of the gold mine are looking for WIMPs, weakly interacting massive particles. These particles are expected to weigh about as much as a proton, but interact with ordinary matter extremely weakly.

At the heart of the detector are seven seven-kilogram crystals of pure sodium iodide.

Derek Muller: So, that’s actually sodium iodide in there?

Unknown bod: Yep.

Derek Muller: I didn’t expect it to be so clear.

The idea is that, very, very rarely, a Dark Matter particle may hit a nucleus in the crystal and transfer its energy. This creates a flash of light, called a ‘scintillation’, which is detected by photo multiplier tubes, very sensitive light detectors, which are positioned above and below each crystal. But there’s a problem. Even the purest sodium iodide crystal contains radioactive potassium; and when a potassium atom decays, it emits an electron and a gamma ray. Now, the electron can cause a scintillation in the crystal, just like the hypothesized Dark Matter particle. So, to eliminate these events, the sodium iodide crystals are submerged in a tank full of 12 tons of linear alkylbenzene. This is a liquid scintillator that emits light when exposed to a gamma ray, and that light can then be detected by photo multiplier tubes in the tank. So, if there’s a simultaneous detection in the crystal and in the tank, it was most likely a potassium decay, not a Dark Matter event. But there’s another problem: cosmic rays. Energetic particles from the Sun and other galaxies hit the top of Earth’s atmosphere, creating muons, essentially heavy electrons, which stream toward the Earth at close to the speed of light. Muons can also create flashes of light in the crystal.

This is a muon detector, and it’s got these three panels of plastic here separated by some pieces of steel. If we see a flash of light in all three basically the same time, then we know that a muon has passed through them. So, if I hit reset, we can see it counting up the muons being seen. So… it’s at least a few a second. This is why all sensitive particle detectors are located deep underground. Here we have the muon detector now, one kilometre underground, and it’s been running for something like 15 minutes. And there have been no muon counts.

Madeleine Zurowski: Yeah. We’d have to leave this running for a long time, I think, even if we wanted to get a single hit. We expect the number of meuons down here to be about a million less, and we didn’t see a million up the top, so we’re probably not going to see any down here.

Derek Muller: And this is the whole point of putting a Dark Matter detector underground. You want to get rid of all the background that would create noise in the detector. But even this shielding is not enough. They’ll have muon detectors immediately above the tank. So if a flash is seen in a crystal at the same time a muon is detected, it can be ruled out.

Being underground brings its own challenges. The walls of the mine contain trace amounts of radioactive elements like uranium and thorium, which decay into radon gas.

A/Prof Phillip Urquijo: The requirements here are fairly serious: for Dark Matter experiments, we have to completely control the environment, in particular the radon level.

Derek Muller: To counteract this, the walls of the cavern are coated with special paint to contain radioactive particles. The crystals are immersed in a continuous stream of pure nitrogen gas, and the entire detector is shielded by 120 tons of steel and plastic. Wow. Look at the size of that cavern. There is a lot riding on this experiment; it will validate or disprove one of the most contentious results in physics.

Prof Elisabetta Barberio: So, if we see nothing, well, this is the death of DAMA/LIBRA. But if we see something, well, we are all happy.

A/Prof Phillip Urquijo: I actually like the idea that because, you know, 80% of the mass of the universe is Dark Matter or Dark ‘stuff’, maybe there’s more than just one particle that Dark Matter is made of; it could be an entire ‘Dark Standard Model’, if you like, a Dark version of everything that we can see, or maybe something more complex because there’s so much more of it. I really hope it’s that.

Derek Muller: Do you think that Dark Matter interacts with ordinary matter?

Prof Geraint Lewis: If we want to find out what this stuff is, we’d better hope there’s some level of interaction that we can at least probe when it comes to doing experiments. If God gave me the ‘Great Book of Physics’ and there were two sections, Section A and Section B, one for the luminous matter and one for Dark Matter, and they didn’t talk to each other, I would say that was a very peculiar universe. But in science we have to live with the possibility that, you know, at some level we may never find the answer. It may elude us. But at least we tried.

Derek Muller: The sponsor of this video, Brilliant, is the opposite of Dark Matter. You see it everywhere and it’s highly interactive. Brilliant is an innovative STEM learning platform that guides you through engaging hands-on courses in math, science and computer science. They have great courses on so many topics, from pre-algebra to probability to computer science fundamentals. It’s the ideal complement to watching educational YouTube videos. After learning about a topic, you can dive deeper and get your hands dirty so you really understand it. For example, if you want to learn more about Dark Matter, gravitational lensing and the cosmic microwave background, I highly recommend their astrophysics course. A lot of care and attention goes into all their courses. Every lesson and interactive simulation builds on what you’ve learned previously, and every step of the way, your knowledge is tested through quizzes which check your understanding and reinforce what you’ve learned. If you get stuck, there’s always a helpful hint, so I encourage you to check out the courses on offer over at and I bet you’ll find something there that you want to learn more about. Plus if you click through right now, Brilliant are offering 20% off an annual premium subscription to the first 200 people to sign up. So I want to thank Brilliant for supporting Veritasium, and I want to thank you for watching.

Veritasium: The Absurd Search For Dark Matter

The transcript above was made with the help of Sonix, which did most of the donkey work for a tiny fee (I did have to spend some time tidying it up). Note that I do not have the copyright owner’s permission to publish this transcript here. I’ve investigated the copyright rules regarding transcriptions (more about that here), and one thing I’ve learned is that it’s no defence to make a disclaimer like “these aren’t my words, no copyright infringement intended.” However, I offer the transcription here as a service to society (especially the deaf community). I do hope the copyright owner won’t object. And I hope that you find this video as interesting as I did.

About peNdantry

Phlyarologist (part-time) and pendant. Campaigner for action against anthropogenic global warming (AGW) and injustice in all its forms. Humanist, atheist, notoftenpist. Wannabe poet, writer and astronaut.
This entry was posted in ... wait, what?, Core thought, Phlyarology, Science and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to The Absurd Search For Dark Matter

    • peNdantry says:

      Thanks, Michael.

      I had to rescue this note from my ‘Spam’ folder; Akismet clearly doesn’t like it. I still wonder why you don’t ‘launch’ as a page with a link to (along with enticing reasons why that link should be followed. It wouldn’t take long. Note too that the ‘Coming Soon’ page on ‘bizmarc’ features a typo; the web address is missing a slash after the ‘https:/’.


  1. A timely post on the subject of Matter, Dark or otherwise on a day when they have started up the Hadron Collider CERN, was restarted again today…. Looking for particles of Matter not discovered before…. Hope they know what they are playing with…
    Many thanks for sharing


  2. Dr Bob Rich says:

    I think it’s mutual racial prejudice: dark matter and light matter refusing to talk with each other. We need to complain to the management.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Considering what is going on in the world today, does any of this dark matter actually matter? Sorry, couldn’t resist. :D

    Liked by 1 person

    • peNdantry says:

      Heh, like it. You have a point. I’ve been in two states myself for some years now: 1) trying to envisage a hopeful future and 2) fearful that there isn’t one; not for any of us. It’s quite the dilemma. Posting things like this helps to remind me that there’s more beyond our own little bubbles.

      Liked by 1 person

I'd love to hear your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s