A first for Scientific American: endorsing a political candidate.

Posted on September 16, 2020 by

These are very, very strange times.

Although Trump and his allies have tried to create obstacles that prevent people from casting ballots safely in November, either by mail or in person, it is crucial that we surmount them and vote. It’s time to move Trump out and elect Biden, who has a record of following the data and being guided by science.

Scientific American

Bobbing Around


“We’ve never backed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history — until now”

This editorial from one of the world’s most respected journals is worth reading.

Regardless of other matters that may influence your vote, and whether you choose to vote at all, please listen to the voice of REASON.

View original post

About pendantry

Phlyarologist (part-time) and pendant. Campaigner for action against anthropogenic global warming (AGW) and injustice in all its forms. Humanist, atheist, notoftenpist. Wannabe poet, writer and astronaut.
This entry was posted in ... wait, what?, Reblogs, Science and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to A first for Scientific American: endorsing a political candidate.

  1. Dr Bob Rich says:
    September 16, 2020 at 10:31

    Thank, Colin. Sanity may prevail???

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply
  2. Dr Bob Rich says:
    September 16, 2020 at 10:32

    Just a quibble:
    “I’d love to hear what your views are!”
    –>
    “I’d like to hear your views.”
    All prose is poetry.
    :))

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply
  3. Robert A. Vella says:
    September 16, 2020 at 22:04

    Bravo, Scientific American!

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply
  4. leavergirl says:
    September 21, 2020 at 03:04

    Really? This poor man?

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  5. leavergirl says:
    September 23, 2020 at 01:37

    Will he? I am not holding my breath. I doubt he remembers the episode. But do let us know if he does.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    • pendantry says:
      September 23, 2020 at 09:22

      OK, I admit that the Democrats should have picked someone a little more sprightly to spearhead their campaign. But the alternative is far, far worse.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
      • leavergirl says:
        September 23, 2020 at 18:10

        How so?

        I am looking at a shitty choice:
        A bullshiteer who, however, has not started any new wars.
        And an Alz Man Walking who is reputed to be a war hawk, and picked a VP who has egged on the rioters.

        I go for the lesser evil. Btw, is there a way to apologize for spewing nonsense one cannot help but spewing because one is not in one’s right mind any more?

        Now I’ll watch the vid.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply
  6. whenmythoughtsaremywritings says:
    September 24, 2020 at 14:42

    That so wonderful post hi can you please once visit my page and trying hard believe me

    Like

    Reply

I'd love to hear what your views are!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.