Seeing the real world, revisited

A fractal Sierpinski triangle, animated

A Sierpinski triangle by Akarpe (click image for licence information)

With a hat tip to Fandango’s Friday Flashback, here we are, albeit a day late, with a post of mine from eight years ago today. There’s nothing special about ‘eight years’; it’s simply that, of all the fourth of April posts I’ve made, this one tickled my nipple nuts the most.

Note that I refer below to Lumosity… although that is a fine program, I’ve since found a brain trainer that I believe to be superior: Elevate. I thoroughly recommend that you try that out (although it asks for a credit card, there is a free option, accessed simply by tapping the ‘X’ when it gets to the credit card stage of your registration).

Appropriately enough for a repeat posting, this one begins thusly:

~~~~~

I seem to have hit a period of recurring themes, coming back to haunt me like a Sierpinski triangle.

A boss of mine some years ago (nice chap) was adamant that he had reached a stage in his life in which ongoing decline in his mental faculties was inevitable. “As everyone knows,” he preached at me, “the brain reaches a peak in your mid-twenties, and then you start to lose brain cells — and they never regrow.” I didn’t believe a word of it at the time; I was convinced that if he was experiencing a drop-off in his mental abilities, he was simply suffering from a severe case of self-fulfilling prophecy.

Recent advances in neuroscience have borne out my belief. Common sense, ‘what everyone knows,’ has failed again: brain cells can regrow. The brain can be thought of as a muscle: it benefits from exercise. I keep getting spam messages from Lumosity that try to persuade me to pay to play their brain games. I’ve held off long enough that they now offer me 35% discount — I’m holding out for 50% :)

Following on from my post illusion and reality last month, Gail at Wit’s End sent me the following image:

An image showing two groups of circles: the circles on the left seem to be indents on a surface, whereas those on the right appear to be bumps

We’re programmed to see the world as though light comes from above

If you’re human, you’ll probably see the same as me: the group of circles on the left appear as indents in a surface, whereas those on the right look like bumps. If we rotate this image through 180 degrees, the bumps will be on the left, and the indents will be on the right — right?

The 'circles illusion' image, rotated 90 degrees (halfway to a complete rotation). The circles all now look the same - and can be seen as either bumps OR indents

Wait, what?

Bumps and indents: rotating the image gets us back where we started from

Rotating the image a full turn gets us… back where we started

— Wrong!

We evolved in an environment where light always comes from above (from the sun); everything we see is interpreted by our brains in that context.

Shadows can lie.

The phrase ‘seeing is believing’ is, in many respects, a nonsense. We never have a true picture of what’s happening in the real world because there’s simply too much information to process. Our brains pick and choose, and interpret incoming data in a way that allows us to perceive the world in a way that is useful to us. This may go some way to explain the problems of cognitive dissonance in general, and climate change denial in particular.

“The world is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine” — JBS Haldane.

Once we begin to appreciate this truth, we are in a position to question the assumptions we make as we go about our daily ‘normal’ lives. And it’s only when we do realise that the world is different from how we’ve always thought it to be that we’ll be in a position to address some of the challenges facing us, such as climate change, overpopulation, peak oil… and so on.

About pendantry

Phlyarologist (part-time) and pendant. Campaigner for action against anthropogenic global warming (AGW) and injustice in all its forms. Humanist, atheist, notoftenpist. Wannabe poet, writer and astronaut.
This entry was posted in ... wait, what?, GCD: Global climate disruption, illusion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Seeing the real world, revisited

  1. Thanks for the food for thought. I suppose this means there is no truth in the statement “Perception is reality.”

    Liked by 1 person

  2. blindzanygirl says:

    You’ve come at this probably from a different angle to me. But we’ve reached the same understanding by different routes.m which actually is quite amazing in itself. I really like this post. It opens up the way for hope. And maybe in fact it applies to the coronavirus crisis too. Great post wibble

    Liked by 1 person

I'd love to hear what your views are!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.