Climbing the Ladder of Awareness

Just so there can be no doubt, the following are not my words, they belong to Paul Chefurka. I reproduce them here because I believe they are insightful and worth repeating.

Climbing the Ladder of Awareness
by Paul Chefurka
This article may be reproduced
in whole or in part, in any manner
and for any purpose whatsoever,
with no restrictions.

When it comes to our understanding of the unfolding global crisis, each of us seems to fit somewhere along a continuum of awareness that can be roughly divided into five stages:

Dead asleep. At this stage there seem to be no fundamental problems, just some shortcomings in human organization, behaviour and morality that can be fixed with the proper attention to rule-making. People at this stage tend to live their lives happily, with occasional outbursts of annoyance around election times or the quarterly corporate earnings seasons.

Awareness of one fundamental problem. Whether it’s Climate Change, overpopulation, Peak Oil, chemical pollution, oceanic over-fishing, biodiversity loss, corporatism, economic instability or sociopolitical injustice, one problem seems to engage the attention completely. People at this stage tend to become ardent activists for their chosen cause. They tend to be very vocal about their personal issue, and blind to any others.

Awareness of many problems. As people let in more evidence from different domains, the awareness of complexity begins to grow. At this point a person worries about the prioritization of problems in terms of their immediacy and degree of impact. People at this stage may become reluctant to acknowledge new problems – for example, someone who is committed to fighting for social justice and against climate change may not recognize the problem of resource depletion. They may feel that the problem space is already complex enough, and the addition of any new concerns will only dilute the effort that needs to be focused on solving the “highest priority” problem.

Awareness of the interconnections between the many problems. The realization that a solution in one domain may worsen a problem in another marks the beginning of large-scale system-level thinking. It also marks the transition from thinking of the situation in terms of a set of problems to thinking of it in terms of a predicament. At this point the possibility that there may not be a solution begins to raise its head.

People who arrive at this stage tend to withdraw into tight circles of like-minded individuals in order to trade insights and deepen their understanding of what’s going on. These circles are necessarily small, both because personal dialogue is essential for this depth of exploration, and because there just aren’t very many people who have arrived at this level of understanding.

Awareness that the predicament encompasses all aspects of life. This includes everything we do, how we do it, our relationships with each other, as well as our treatment of the rest of the biosphere and the physical planet. With this realization, the floodgates open, and no problem is exempt from consideration or acceptance. The very concept of a “Solution” is seen through, and cast aside as a waste of effort.

For those who arrive at Stage 5 there is a real risk that depression will set in. After all, we’ve learned throughout our lives that our hope for tomorrow lies in our ability to solve problems today. When no amount of human cleverness appears able to solve our predicament the possibility of hope can vanish like a the light of a candle flame, to be replaced by the suffocating darkness of despair.

How people cope with despair is of course deeply personal, but it seems to me there are two general routes people take to reconcile themselves with the situation. These are not mutually exclusive, and most of us will operate out of some mix of the two. I identify them here as general tendencies, because people seem to be drawn more to one or the other. I call them the outer path and the inner path.

If one is inclined to choose the outer path, concerns about adaptation and local resilience move into the foreground, as exemplified by the Transition Network and Permaculture Movement. To those on the outer path, community-building and local sustainability initiatives will have great appeal. Organized party politics seems to be less attractive to people at this stage, however. Perhaps politics is seen as part of the problem, or perhaps it’s just seen as a waste of effort when the real action will take place at the local level.

If one is disinclined to choose the outer path either because of temperament or circumstance, the inner path offers its own set of attractions.

Choosing the inner path involves re-framing the whole thing in terms of consciousness, self-awareness and/or some form of transcendent perception. For someone on this path it is seen as an attempt to manifest Gandhi’s message, “Become the change you wish to see in the world,” on the most profoundly personal level. This message is similarly expressed in the ancient Hermetic saying, “As above, so below.” Or in plain language, “In order to heal the world, first begin by healing yourself.”

However, the inner path does not imply a “retreat into religion”. Most of the people I’ve met who have chosen an inner path have as little use for traditional religion as their counterparts on the outer path have for traditional politics. Organized religion is usually seen as part of the predicament rather than a valid response to it. Those who have arrived at this point have no interest in hiding from or easing the painful truth, rather they wish to create a coherent personal context for it. Personal spirituality of one sort or another often works for this, but organized religion rarely does.

It’s worth mentioning that there is also the possibility of a serious personal difficulty at this point. If someone cannot choose an outer path for whatever reasons, and is also resistant to the idea of inner growth or spirituality as a response the the crisis of an entire planet, then they are truly in a bind. There are few other doorways out of this depth of despair. If one remains stuck here for an extended period of time, life can begin to seem awfully bleak, and violence against either the world or oneself may begin begin to seem like a reasonable option. Keep a watchful eye on your own progress, and if you encounter someone else who may be in this state, please offer them a supportive ear.

From my observations, each successive stage contains roughly a tenth of the number people as the one before it. So while perhaps 90% of humanity is in Stage 1, less than one person in ten thousand will be at Stage 5 (and none of them are likely to be politicians). The number of those who have chosen the inner path in Stage 5 also seems to be an order of magnitude smaller than the number who are on the outer path.

I happen to have chosen an inner path as my response to a Stage 5 awareness. It works well for me, but navigating this imminent (transition, shift, metamorphosis – call it what you will), will require all of us – no matter what our chosen paths – to cooperate on making wise decisions in difficult times.

Best wishes for a long, exciting and fulfilling journey.

Bodhi Paul Chefurka
October 19, 2012

About peNdantry

Phlyarologist (part-time) and pendant. Campaigner for action against anthropogenic global warming (AGW) and injustice in all its forms. Humanist, atheist, notoftenpist. Wannabe poet, writer and astronaut.
This entry was posted in balance, Biodiversity, Climate, Communication, Core thought, Education, Environment, GCD: Global climate disruption, Health, History, People, Strategy and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Climbing the Ladder of Awareness

  1. rhc55 says:

    That was a fascinating article and so true. I was particularly struck by the Gandhi quote, which I’ve not heard before – that should be everyone’s motto in life. I don’t think I’ll ever reach stage 5 (too old now to get there…) but I like to think I am at least aware of what needs to be done and do my best to play my small part. Thank you for posting this.

    Liked by 1 person

    • pendantry says:

      Some would say “you’re never too old,” but I can certainly sympathise. You may think your part is small, but we’re all in this together, so thanks for all you do! :)


  2. Thank you for sharing this. I love the “ladder of awareness”. I’m holding onto this to read again later. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  3. David Redpath says:

    ‘Reframing’ is a most important process,
    for the human need to grasp at the big
    picture. Plato wrote of man’s desire to
    see order in the chaos.
    Thanks for the ‘thought food’.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. This is one of those articles you never forget, one of those things that stays etched in your mind. Thank you for sharing this.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. mistermuse says:

    Reaching stage 5 doesn’t have to end in despair if one is a realist blessed with an ironic, if not morbid, sense of humor….but I suppose those qualities must be latent in a person and realized over time.

    Liked by 1 person

    • pendantry says:

      You’re not wrong! I think I have a sense of humour (but then: doesn’t everyone?). I had this Cunning Plan once to create another blog all about nonsense (which I find can be very humorous), but that project has languished on a back burner for so long that it’s grown roots and is thinking about walking out on me. In the meantime, I’ll take your advice to heart and try to inject a little more humour where I can…

      Liked by 1 person

  6. The latest Moneybox programme broadcast by the BBC (Radio 4) was devoted to an analysis of the link between the latest economic figures from a number of countries and the happiness of their citizens. It included reference to the Action for Happiness, as in

    It struck me as pertinent to your post.

    It may be listened to here:

    Liked by 1 person

    • pendantry says:

      Thanks for those links, Paul. I followed your BBC link but couldn’t figure out which of the various programmes I should listen to in order to hear what you’re referring to. I did find a link there to the World Happiness Report, though, which makes interesting reading (I didn’t read the whole report!). It’s good to know that there are people working on such things, even if they don’t impact upon our daily lives very much.

      Is it Bhutan that has a ‘Gross National Happiness’ instead of ‘Gross Domestic Product’? (Google tells me: yes). I’ve often thought that the former would make for a better measure, myself.


  7. Bill Ziegler says:

    From DuckDuck:
    The term was coined in 1972 by Bhutan’s fourth Dragon King, Jigme Singye Wangchuck.
    1972 was a great year for such thought. And right next to 1973, when I experienced an odd “vision” that something very, very wrong was happening. Much later, I read the first news releases regarding the fact that Exxon’s researchers had already known about climate change.


  8. Pingback: Illustrating exponential growth using movement towards a target, revisited | Wibble

I'd love to hear your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.