Does the denial industry have its teeth in GMO too?

I’ve been against the idea of tinkering with genes to create new things for people to eat for some considerable millennia (or so it seems). My objection is quite simple: though they may believe that they are, most humans aren’t smart enough to realise the long-term implications of their actions.

I believe in the concept of having a responsibility to the seventh generation. Unfortunately, the society in which I live does not.

We cannot simply think of ourselves and our survival; each generation has a responsibility to “ensure the survival for the seventh generation”.[…] The prophecy given to [the Indigenous peoples], tells us that what we do today will affect the seventh generation and because of this we must bear in mind our responsibility to them today and always.

Our Responsibility to the Seventh Generation

I stumbled upon this today and shook my head in disgust:

A 2012 study by Professor Gilles-Eric Séralini’s team at the University of Caen, France showed that eating GM maize and low doses of the Roundup pesticide with which it is grown damaged the health of rats over the long term ( for more information ). Other studies on GM foods also show toxic effects.

The treated rats suffered more severe organ damage, and higher rates of tumours and premature death, than controls.

This was the first long-term study on the commercialized GM maize NK603 and its associated pesticide and the most detailed study on any GM food.

The first tumours showed up only 4-7 months into the study. This shows that the 90-day rat feeding tests routinely done by industry on GM foods in support of regulatory approval are too short to detect effects that take time to appear, such as cancer, organ damage, and premature death.

We demand an immediate freeze on approvals of genetically modified (GM) foods until mandatory, transparent, and independently conducted long-term tests have been put in place internationally.

GM safety tests must examine the effects of eating the GM food and its associated pesticide over a lifetime. We demand the same testing for GM foods already on the market.

Avaaz petition to support GMO cancer research

If you think that I’m just panic-mongering, please visit GMO Seralini and think again.

About peNdantry

Phlyarologist (part-time) and pendant. Campaigner for action against anthropogenic global warming (AGW) and injustice in all its forms. Humanist, atheist, notoftenpist. Wannabe poet, writer and astronaut.
This entry was posted in ... wait, what?, Business, Capitalism, Communication, Core thought, Culture, Economics, Environment, Food, Health, Ludditis, People, Phlyarology, Science, Strategy and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Does the denial industry have its teeth in GMO too?

  1. I’ve been ranting about GMOs for years already. Unfortunately too few people listen. No one knows what the long term effects of this stuff will be, but it seems the government could care less. I write my representatives and they send me polite bullshit replies.

    Liked by 1 person

    • pendantry says:

      Ah, yes, “bull”. Segues neatly into mad cow disease:

      Q: what do you get when you feed meat scraps to herbivores?
      A: lots of profit for a while, but then, oh bugger, we can no longer deny the nasty result.
      Q: Such a pity our hubris led us to believe that there might be no consequence to giving nature the finger.
      A: Will we learn from it?
      Q: Oh, I’m sorry, what were you saying?
      A: I don’t know; I seem to have lost my train of thought for some reason…


  2. I’d read the same report recently, and I’m with you on the 7th generation. Native Americans made no decisions unless first considering the 7th.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. lails42 says:

    ah, the good ol roundup. i was reading a thing in the paper the other day about glyphosate (the poison itself, roundup’s the brand’s name). its use is… limited here, especially in public/around waterways. from what i was reading, yup obviously toxic, but it breaks down fairly quickly… but! we don’t know much about the chemisty of what it breaks down into (I assume it doesn’t break down into water and oxygen.) and i have an american mate who was telling me glyphosate is found in a LOT of the food they eat! which to me is TERRIFYING. but then… some of our honey just got banned from Japan cause it had traces of glyphosate, everyone’s running round yelling ‘HOW DID THIS HAPPEN’. so yeah… i can’t judge murica too much right now! anyways, yeah – glyphosate bad. monsanto bad. gmo without the glyphosate…. i really should do some google-scholaring searches, i’ve heard differing views from members of the scientific community!

    Liked by 1 person

    • pendantry says:

      Welcome to Wibble, lails42! (Hmm… ’42’… good number: I hope you have your towel ready for next Tuesday?)

      Yes… debate is tricky. We lowly individuals are hampered by insufficient time to investigate and unravel all of the conflicting views — certain other groups (including ‘Big Ag’, ‘Big Pharma’ and ‘Big Tech’) aren’t; and, call me a cynic, but I’m pretty sure that they make good use of this inequity to deliberately serve up misinformation, disinformation, and outright lies so as to protect their god-given right to continue fleecing the flummoxed flock.

      PS In my opinion, you ought to consider doing ‘DuckDuckGo-scholaring searches’ instead of the other variety; the fact that the other lot quietly ditched their motto “Don’t be evil” a while back speaks volumes about their current intentions.


I'd love to hear your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s