Nuclear power: how we got into this mess

A tale of the withholding of truth; implementation of untested designs; toothless ‘overseers’ and safety compromised in favour of political and business expediency.

Pandora’s Box: A is for Atom

The film linked to the article above is an hour long, but it’s an eye-opener. Some quotes:

“… Russia announced that it had built the world’s first nuclear power station. What the Soviets did not reveal was that it took more electricity to run the plant than it produced.”

Windscale, UK, October 1957: “… the radioactivity released was far worse than the public was told.”

“The (US) Federal Government and the nuclear industry decided that the absence of proof of danger was almost as good as proof of safety.”

Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania, US, March 1979: “… my principle concern is that we got an accident that we’ve never been designed to accommodate… this is a failure mode that’s never been studied.”

“A nuclear generating plant is as harmless as a chocolate factory.”

‘As harmless as…’? Right. Pull the other one.

About pendantry

Phlyarologist (part-time) and pendant. Campaigner for action against anthropogenic global warming (AGW) and injustice in all its forms. Humanist, atheist, notoftenpist. Wannabe poet, writer and astronaut.
This entry was posted in Communication, Core thought, Energy, Environment, News and politics, Strategy and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

I'd love to hear what your views are!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.